<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Spam Wars Dispatches</title>
<link>http://spamwars.com/</link>
<description></description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 10:41:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.121</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>OMG! A Spammer Lied!</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A penis pill purveyor has been sending out messages that have two short sentences of clearly visible text, all of which is a clickable link. That text reads:</p>

<blockquote>
Your IT department has been paid to allow us to send you these mails. Check out the results
</blockquote>

<p>The messages also include light grey hash-busting text in the hope of bypassing whatever spam filtering "your IT department" has installed to keep this type of crap out of your inbox.</p>

<p>I wasn't born yesterday, but the domain for the link was. In a double joke, the registrant used a domain registration service that doesn't reveal any information about the registrant beyond his name: SUNMM in this case. As if spammers use real info in their domain tasting scams!</p>

<p>No one reading this blog, of course, would believe for an instant that this spammer had greased the palms of the IT department to get past the barricades. But it wouldn't surprise me to find non-techie employees at decent-sized companies taking this at face value. They either fear or dislike the IT department. In the first case, they obey anything that has an "IT" stamp on it&mdash;fake or real&mdash;and will immediately click the link; in the second case, they'll get angry that those nerds in the IT department are getting rich off spammers, and will check out the link to see what the pitch is all about. If the spammer&mdash;the one doing the mailing, not necessarily the one selling the pills&mdash;gets paid for hits on the spamvertised web site, he wins. He now has verifiable statistics that his botnet emailing system works (delivering <del>suckers</del> potential customers), meaning he can pitch it to other sellers.</p>

<p>Many of these messages naturally arrive at servers like mine, where I <em>am</em> the IT department. If only they'd offer me some coin to spam me. I could use the dough, and I have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//dev/null">Dave Null</a>'s inbox ready to receive in large quantities.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/09/omg_a_spammer_l.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/09/omg_a_spammer_l.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 10:41:04 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Malware Spam for a September Morn</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Ah, it's a new month, and here in the U.S., we have the Labor Day holiday. Except for those whose holiday is being stolen by the Gustav hurricane, there will be lots of picnics, ball games, and end-of-summer parties. In the meantime, your email inbox is filling up with the usual crappage.</p>

<p>On the malware lure front, a long-running e-card scam is continuing, as the perps take over additional web sites to host their downloadable deliveries. New this morning are a couple of strange malware lure samples whose Subject: lines drop the names of&mdash;ta-da&mdash;Obama and McCain. The actual Subject: lines I've seen don't make much sense, but what else is new?</p>

<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Obama Announces for President -- In Hit Show '24'</li>
<li>McCain, Obama: Cosmo Cover Also Tasteless, Offensive</li>
<li>Obama Promises Change for a Nation, Change For a Twenty</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>

<p>The messages encourage you to follow a link to a hijacked web site, where the crooks have inserted a page named index98.html. A visit to the page automatically downloads video98.exe (for which VirusTotal shows a very high recognition rate). Whether or not the auto-download works, a visitor to the page (why are you doing that?) sees the following:</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch09_01_08.jpg" alt="Malware site prompt to download video codec" />
</blockquote>

<p>What looks like a dialog box is actually an absolute-positioned <code>div</code> element&mdash;a Dynamic HTML technique used by some to create content that is draggable around the browser window. Unlike a real dialog box, however, if you try to drag this one beyond the edge of the browser window, it is clipped by the browser window. In the meantime, the image of the video viewer&mdash;and that's all it is: an image&mdash;is an animated .gif image with the spinner spinning away, as if the player is "tapping its foot" waiting for the visitor to act.</p>

<p>What strikes me most about this page, however, is the choice of page title, which appears in the browser window's titlebar. It's either a leftover from some other campaign, or it's the final "grabber" to encourage visitors to download that malware loader...I mean, video codec. </p>

<p>But the email messages were about politics. As if politics and porn are somehow related....</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/09/malware_spam_fo.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/09/malware_spam_fo.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 09:45:06 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>E-Profiteers Ready for Disaster</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The good folks at the SANS Internet Storm Center have reported (<a href="http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=4954">here</a> and <a href="http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=4957">here</a>) that domain names containing the string "gustav" are being gobbled up in anticipation of Hurricane Gustav coming ashore along the Gulf coast. A lot of these domain names blend "gustav" with words like "relief," "charity," and "donation."</p>

<p>It's possible that some of this domain name parking is being done by individuals or organizations who will set up legitimate web sites if this storm does a Katrina-esque number on the same region. Make that remotely possible.</p>

<p>My bet is that the parking spot owners will either try to resell the domains to legitimate organizations or the domains will be used directly by phony fund raising scams. Let any tragedy occur, and there will be plenty of scum out there trying to take advantage of generous folks who truly want to help.</p>

<p>Remember that there are safe places to find out where you can help. The first place I tend to look is at cnn.com, where a click of the IMPACT button (near the top right corner of the home page) will bring you lists of charities and other outlets where you can help.</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch08_31_08b.jpg" alt="cnn.com IMPACT button" />
</blockquote>

<p>Disasters such as tsunamis and earthquakes come with little or no warning. Hurricanes, cyclones, and typhoons, on the other hand, are known well in advance of potential catastrophe. That gives profiteers plenty of time to be in place to reap rewards from others' suffering.</p>

<p>Similar domain names for Hurricane Hanna are already being registered.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/eprofiteers_rea_1.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/eprofiteers_rea_1.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:33:06 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Alert Message Phishing</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Phishing is pretty much all the same&mdash;luring you to a web site that looks just like the login page for a financial institution or anywhere else where a username/password combination opens the gates to goodies.</p>

<p>If one is wary of the overt style of phishing message&mdash;the one where there is a problem with your account, and you should log in to fix it&mdash;the shields might lower for a moment when the phishing message has a bit of indirection to it. Such is the case of one I saw this morning, which tries to lure a Capital One customer to view a message within the bank's web site messaging system. The institution with which I do online banking has a Mail section of the web site, where we can communicate with each other electronically. I believe this is fairly common. And, of course, the only way you can view such messages is by logging into the site.</p>

<p>The phishing message wasn't particularly professional-looking, but here it is just the same:</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch08_31_08.jpg" alt="Capital One mail system phishing message" />
</blockquote>

<p>Note that my email client, Microsoft's Entourage for the Mac, renders hidden link addresses in plain view. Most recipients of this phishing message would just see "click here" as a clickable link, with no visible URL. Thus, even if they knew what to look for, they might not recognize that the URL is to an IP address in Poland. </p>

<p>Now, I've heard of outsourcing, but humongo Capital One isn't going to host its login pages at a hacked server in Warsaw.</p>

<p>This serves as a reminder that if you receive any type of communication purporting to come from a financial institution with whom you do business, use your established bookmark to visit the site and log in through that page. </p>

<p>I also go one step further&mdash;even with bookmarked pages&mdash;to make sure that the login page has the correct URL in the Address bar and the SSL certificate is in force (at least as much as the browser reveals). I perform that check for <em>every page</em> that requests login credentials, even accounts that seem harmless in that they don't contain much personal information. Why am I so paranoid about this? Because if a crook gets hold of any one username/password combination, there is a good chance that that combo will open doors at other sites (no, I don't have individual combinations for each freakin' site that requires a login&mdash;and it seems as though you've gotta open an account at more and more sites these days just to get basic information). It's trivial for crooks to set up robots that try your credentials at thousands of sites. All it takes is one success to expose further personal or credit card data stored on those servers associated with that username/password pairing.</p>

<p>It's sad that we have to concern ourselves about this stuff. But taking a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_E._Neuman">What, me worry?</a> attitude puts you directly in the line of fire from way too many Bad Guys.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/alert_message_p.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/alert_message_p.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:49:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>University Degree--No Larnin&apos; Needed</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Legitimate universities&mdash;including those from whom you can <em>earn</em> a real degree&mdash;always put their best feet forward to attract students. Fancy catalogs, professionally-done web sites&mdash;whatever it takes to exude professionalism, class, and taste.</p>

<p>In contrast comes the Subject: line of one of those "dial-a-degree" spam messages, which promise that one's work experience (oops, they forgot to mention the money) is good enough to <em>obtain</em> a degree, including a Doctorate. Professionalism, class, and taste? You decide:</p>

<blockquote>
Subject: FW: Is your skills about to expired?
</blockquote>

<p>Is you is, or is you ain't college material?</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/university_degr.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/university_degr.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:16:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Phony Anti-Virus Software</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The malware lure <em>du jour</em> advertises security software for home or business, depending on which variant of the email you receive. Here are a few Subject: lines I've seen:</p>

<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Business Security Software</li>
<li>You Computer Security. For you home.</li>
<li>A new standard of Internet threat protection for your home.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>

<p>The first line of the messages varies, but the balance of all the messages I've seen are identical. Here's one variant:</p>

<blockquote>
Anti-Virus Nero Advanced Pro. 2008. Download last update! &lt;http://[removed].com/dhl/dhl.php&gt; 

<p>6 month free trial! </p>

<p>A new standard of Internet threat protection for your home or small office. <br />
Award-winning protection against viruses and spyware, identity theft and phishing, hackers and spam.</p>

<p>Anti-Virus Nero Advanced Pro. 2009 antivirus software with maximum spyware protection. <br />
Protects against viruses, Trojans, and worms, spyware and adware, rootkits, identity theft and phishing attacks.<br />
Advanced proactive protection, unmatched system performance, <br />
automatic hourly updates and the fastest response to the latest threats.<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>All URLs of the ones I've seen (all hijacked web servers) lead to a PHP program called dhl.php, which automatically downloads name.avi.exe to a visiting PC. That Trojan downloader is recognized by most legitimate antivirus software, according to a VirusTotal scan.</p>

<p>Accepting an invitation to download and install unknown antivirus software from an unknown sender is about as safe as French-kissing a stranger in the influenza ward. Both lead to infections that you don't really want to experience.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/phony_antivirus.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/phony_antivirus.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:55:44 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bogus Windows Updates</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Two flavors of phony Windows update notices have been arriving in the past few hours.</p>

<p>The first arrived with a variety of Subject: lines, such as:</p>

<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Important Microsoft Windows Update</li>
<li>Critical Microsoft Windows Update</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>

<p>Message bodies also varied a little, but generally followed the format of this one:</p>

<blockquote>
Dear Microsoft Customer,

<p>You are receiving this message because your version of Microsoft Windows is affected by a dangerous security vulnerability.</p>

<p>In order to prevent possible risk of system instability, Microsoft urges you to update at your earliest convenience.</p>

<p>We are providing a free update to all Microsoft Windows users.</p>

<p>You can update your system for free by visiting the offical website for this patch, at http://updatemanagement.[removed].net/?customerservice<br />
Thank you for your understanding in this matter.</p>

<p>Regards,<br />
Wilton Silver<br />
Business Relations Rep.<br />
Microsoft Corp.<br />
http://updatemanagement.[removed].net/?customerservice</p>

</blockquote>

<p>The domain name, which includes the words <em>system</em> and <em>update</em>, was registered today, and the supposed registrant is [get this] "Government of St. Vincent and the Grenadines."</p>

<p>Almost anyone in the PC biz would know that Microsoft, itself, would never publicly label any vulnerability as "dangerous." But it's a good word to get the attention of the less technically aware.</p>

<p>Onto the second attempt, which arrived here in rapid succession with the same Subject: and message body:</p>

<blockquote>
Subject: Free Update For Windows

<p>Dear dannyg@dannyg.com, Free Update for Windows Xp,Vista<br />
http://[IP Address Removed]/setup.exe<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>Each message was sent from a different botnet client, in a not atypical fire hose spray of spam. All of the messages I received pointed to the same IP address hosted in Moldova. To my surprise, the account at that address had been shut down pretty quickly&mdash;a responsible response I'm not accustomed to seeing from those environs.</p>

<p>At the two destinations, the techniques for infecting visitors' machines were quite different, with the first one being far more elaborate. It may be that two crooks/gangs happened upon the same email approach within hours of each other. Whether this was serendipity or an orchestrated event doesn't matter to users. Identifying bogus notices should matter a great deal.</p>

<p>Be it now and forever known that major operating system vendors (e.g., Microsoft and Apple) have spent oodles of money to build system updating mechanisms into their operating systems. If there were such a dire need to update an OS that it caused the companies to send emergency email messages to their customers (a near zero likelihood, BTW), both companies would direct customers to use the internal updating mechanisms, and not provide a link to visit to download the update.</p>

<p>There must be, however, a goodly number of Windows users out there who use pirated copies of XP and Vista. The internal Windows Update mechanism isn't available to them because their OSes fail the "genuine advantage" test. Heaven knows what else was delivered with the pirated OS already, but their users would probably be tempted to download a supposedly free update that lets them avoid Microsoft's laser-eyed stare. I don't have a lot of sympathy for the pirate users, and getting their systems pwned by a botnet might feel like Justice...except that it means that their systems will be used to flood my inbox with spam and perhaps attack my web sites. Vigilantism on the Internet usually backfires on the vigilantes.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/bogus_windows_u.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/bogus_windows_u.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:25:21 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Back to News (Sorta)</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Malware lures continue unabated, arriving as <a href="http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/ecard_malware_l.html">bogus e-card announcements</a>, <a href="http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/07/supermarket_tab.html">supermarket tabloid spam</a>, and, today, largely idiotic and not very clever "Weekly top news," as the Subject: lines read (yesterday, the line was "BREAKING new"). Message bodies contain a couple of sentences, a link to a hijacked web site, where the crooks have planted the index1.html file in the root web directory, and a further lure: "Read All (nn) breaking news and nn shocking videos," where "nn" are numbers that vary with each message.</p>

<p>Some of these "hot" news items are dull; others stupid. Here are some samples for your entertainment:</p>

<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Windows 7 details to be released &mdash; Technical information about the successor to Windows Vista will be revealed at two October conferences, says Microsoft.</li>
<li>Madonna and Angelina Jolie in adoption war related lesbian romp! &mdash; Race to adopt as much of Africa as they can.</li>
<li>George Bush Pardons Lindsay Lohan &mdash; President George W. Bush presided over Lindsay Lohan's trial and gave her a full pardon, but left the fine intact.</li>
<li>Hundreds Flock to View Image of Jesus in Vomit Puddle &mdash; Hundreds of faithful Christians have lined up around the block of a bar in Long Beach, California to pray before an image in a puddle of vomit they believe represents Jesus Christ.</li>
<li>Aliens Are Gay Says Astronaut &mdash; Former Astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell - a veteran of the Apollo 14 mission - claims aliens are gay and that they are responsible for many of the earth's ills including global warming, war, disease and The View.</li>
<li>Bigcock Discovered In Georgia &mdash; After the discovery of Bigfoot in Georgia comes another discovery - Bigcock - a giant of a man in more ways than one and a beast that certainly needs taming.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>

<p>Two words: Ree diculous.</p>

<p>And yet, there will be enough bored or curious PC users out there to make this campaign successful enough in its desire to enroll new PCs into a botnet.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/back_to_news_so.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/back_to_news_so.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:42:30 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>No, Dammit, I Am NOT Subscribed</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I've heard of someone putting words into your mouth&mdash;to make it appear you said something you didn't&mdash;but some of the slicker spammers (slick, as in greasy) want to put clicks into my mouse.</p>

<p>A spam message promoting a "webinar" unfortunately found its way into my email client (which suspected it was junk). From what I could tell in the text part of the message (I'm not downloading the images), this webinar is nothing more than a sales pitch for a piece of business software.</p>

<p>At the bottom of the message, in 10-pixel light grey type is the following line:</p>

<blockquote>
You are receiving this email as a subscribed reader of eChannelLine Daily News and have selected to receive promotions from our partners.
</blockquote>

<p>Every time I look up the word "subscribe" in dictionaries, I keep coming up with the same requirement of the subscriber having to actively participate in the action. Here are some excerpts from the <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/subscribe">Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>to assent to</li>
<li>to give consent or approval to something written by signing</li>
<li>to enter one's name for a publication or service</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>

<p>Because I did none of the above, how can I be subscribed? If I never subscribed, how can I have then selected to receive promotions?</p>

<p>Sir, I allege that your pants are on fire.</p>

<p>I <em>never</em> unsubscribe from lists to which I have not subscribed. If the sender lies about my initial subscription, how can I trust him to do the right thing with my unsubscribe request? Even clicking the unsubscribe link could potentially cook my goose, because the URL is coded with my email address, which the server will track instantly.</p>

<p>Some governments have been toying with antispam legislation that requires senders of email solicitations to maintain an audit trail of how an email address found its way onto a list in the first place. I advocate this in <em>Spam Wars</em> if, for no other reason, it could expose liars in their lies (like the ones that claim you subscribed from an IP address&mdash;that happens to be located in Outer Crockistan). Unfortunately, that idea would also put extra burdens on those senders who have used correct opt-in procedures all along. As with a great deal of the U.S. CAN-SPAM law, such legislation makes business more difficult for those who do the right thing by their very natures, and fails to curb abuses by those who thumb their noses at the laws, especially from outside the U.S.</p>

<p>For the clown who sent today's missive, I'll simply delete all future messages right on my server. He can continue to flog my email address to his partners, inflating his list by one that is guaranteed to provide zero return. It's just my little contribution to a lower response rate his potential partners can count on. </p>

<p>Now that's something I can subscribe to.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/no_dammit_i_am.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/no_dammit_i_am.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:32:56 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>E-Card Malware Lures, Part Umpteen</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>For the moment, at least, the run of <a href="http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/07/supermarket_tab.html">supermarket tabloid</a> and other phony news-related malware email lures appear to be on hiatus. In their place come a raft of messages claiming to have links to electronic greeting cards sent by "somebody," "a friend," or a "flatmate" (to those of us in the States, this last term is quaintly European). The crooks blew the dust off a golden oldie for this campaign.</p>

<p>Here are some of the Subject: lines I've seen come my way:</p>

<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>This is for you.</li>
<li>Open now for your eCard</li>
<li>Greetings from...?</li>
<li>You Have An Ecard</li>
<li>Your Digital Greeting Card is waiting</li>
<li>A greeting for you</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>

<p>The messages are simple, pointing to a variety of freshly-minted domain names that sound like they're right out of the dot-com boom days&mdash;containing word combinations such as "PostcardShop", "Lettercard," and "PostcardOnline." Here's a sample message:</p>

<blockquote>
Your friend has sent you an Ecard from [removed]Lettercard.com.

<p>To get your Ecard, goto the following link.</p>

<p>http://[removed]Lettercard.com/?e4e35ab2769300aa</p>

<p>(c) 2003-2008 [removed]Lettercard.com.<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>The copyright line is a touch that adds a sense of respectability to an unwary recipient ("Ooh, they've been in business since 2003...it must be legitimate.").</p>

<p>This is all pretty standard botnet fare. The destination servers are compromised PCs accessed through the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_flux">fast flux</a> technique, where each traceroute attempt (or click of the link) leads to a different IP address, making it difficult to take down the malware delivery sites.</p>

<p>The earliest e-card malware deliveries I remember came as attachments to email messages. Later, as delivery migrated to compromised servers, many e-card fakes abused the good names of legitimate electronic greeting card companies. The links were either to numeric IP addresses or other compromised web sites (actual addresses hidden in an HTML link). For this latest campaign, the crooks have created their own domains and fast flux network. </p>

<p>Regardless of distribution medium, the allure of receiving a greeting from a secret admirer is the same, olde tyme con game destined to enlist more vulnerable PCs to the botnets.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/ecard_malware_l.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/ecard_malware_l.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:00:48 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>iTunes/Apple ID Phishing Campaign</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I really fear that this phishing campaign will catch quite a few Apple customers off-guard. Here's what the mailing piece looks like:</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch08_03_08a.jpg" alt="iTunes phishing message" />
</blockquote>

<p>With so many people these days using the iTunes store not only for music, but now downloading millions of iPhone applications (even the free ones cause the iTunes Store to generate emailed receipts), there are tons and tons of computer users of all flavors having constant contact with the iTunes Store. An alleged alert about a billing problem will get their attention.</p>

<p>Will, however, every recipient bother to notice that the link is not to apple.com, but to [removed].ws (see status bar in the above message)? Are users advanced enough to check the message's header info to see that the message was sent from an IP address in Sweden. Worse yet, if they click on the link and see the following page, will they suspect it's not really Apple's site if they don't confirm the Address field?</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch08_03_08b.jpg" alt="Phony Apple Store phishing web site page" />
</blockquote>

<p>Please spread the word that if any institution for which you have an online account claims to have a problem with the account, never <em>ever</em> follow links or URLs in emailed messages&mdash;don't even visit the phony page unless you know how to prescreen it safely for malware nastiness. Instead, log into your account through normal means (ideally through a bookmark you previously established with the legitimate site). If there is a problem with your account, you can check it out that way. In 99.99% of the cases (assuming 0.01% deadbeats), there is no problem with your account, and you can move on after deleting the phishing message.</p>

<p>Remember that your Apple ID provides a gateway not only to the iTunes Store, but to the Apple Store, with all its Maclicious and iPodlicious goodies that can be shipped anywhere on <em>your</em> credit card.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/itunesapple_id.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/08/itunesapple_id.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 11:31:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Now We Know Where All the Oil Profits Go</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>After being gouged at the petrol pump, one might feel inclined to collect a rebate:</p>

<blockquote>
Subject: THIS IS FOR YOU

<p>I am Herron Thanks, Financial Controller of Exxon Mobil in London, http://www.exxonmobil.co.uk) We are seeking your  assistance to transfer of FIFTEEN MILLION,FIVE HUNDRED&gt; POUNDS STERLING to your account for further private investment.Please reply with your names,contact address and&gt; cell phone no</p>

<p>Herron Thanks<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>Yes, this is how mega corporations invest their funds: By sending out email to anyone with an email account, and taking replies only through a yahoo.com email address. And, of course, they'll gladly put thirty million bucks into any ol' bank account, even if it's some shaky local bank whose accounts are insured only to $100K.</p>

<p>As loony as this 419er appears to be, I can also envision a recipient on the financial edge being desperate enough to get caught up in this scam in the hope of skimming a little something off the top. In this battle of Greed vs. Greed, funds move only in the direction of the 419er.</p>

<p>Herron, no thanks.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/07/now_we_know_whe.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/07/now_we_know_whe.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:35:21 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Windows News Malware Lure</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I've seen a series of email messages tonight that have Subject: lines generally referring to "Windows Portal News" or "Windows Team." The message bodies tend to be nearly incomprehensible in English. Here are some samples:</p>

<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Last News in video format! Only Best and hot news!</li>
<li>Last new: The American junky eats the eyes. Look at sample!</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>

<p>Links are to various domains in the following format:</p>

<blockquote>
http://[removed].com/upp/fast.php
</blockquote>

<p>The destination program redirects to a page that automatically downloads a file named video.avi.exe, for which VirusTotal reports a pretty dismal 10/35 identification rate.</p>

<p>Unlike some of the other recent malware campaigns, which aim for minimalism in their bodies (simple text line and URL), these have both text and HTML-formatted segments. Both segments include an official-sounding trailer that makes the message appear to be delivered as part of the recipient's membership in Microsoft Live:</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch07_30_08.jpg" alt="Windows news malware lure message" />
</blockquote>

<p>These guys also took the time to program some strange stuff in the message header. In particular, they insert a second Received: header line making it look as though my email server generated the line (which it definitely did not). The (presumably botnet) program that sends the messages customizes each message's extra Received: line. There is also a mistake in their program because the line includes two placeholders for randomized numbers. D'oh!</p>

<p>Given the low virus program detection for the payload, this could be a pretty nasty chunk of Bad Stuff. Don't go there.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/07/windows_news_ma.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/07/windows_news_ma.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:14:20 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Supermarket Tabloid Spam</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Although "tabloid" generally refers to the physical size of a newspaper page&mdash;smaller than the traditional newspaper page&mdash;here in the States the term more commonly connotes newsprint publications that have glaring and sensational headlines. Visit nearly any grocery store checkout line, and you'll see copies of <em>The National Enquirer</em>, <em>The Globe</em>, <em>Star</em>, and others shouting headlines about celebrities (dead, alive, or otherwise) in dire situations, UFOs, freaks of nature, bogus medical breakthroughs, and so on. The veracity of the stories and photos...well, I find it hard to believe that JFK had a love child with an alien from another galaxy.</p>

<p>Now, look at some of these sensationalist headlines:</p>

<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>F.B.I. Looks Into Facebook</li>
<li>US athletes banned from Beijing Olympics</li>
<li>Research show that London is the second capital of India</li>
<li>Air pollution forces Beijing closure</li>
<li>Steve Jobs diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and has about a week to
live</li>
<li>A-rod dropped from team</li>
<li>MRI show promise for detection of early Alzheimer's</li>
<li>Dark Knight disapproved by Vaticans due to satanic links</li>
<li>Cars that really transform</li>
<li>British PM to quit</li>
<li>China denies visa to German athletes, angering world community</li>
<li>Huge oil spill off California coastline</li>
<li>Bomb scare in UK stops traffic</li>
<li>Army Of Two, Dick Cheney And John Mccain Invade Iran</li>
<li>Cannibalism!........In The Usa</li>
<li>[audio] Hillary Receives 3 A.M. Phone Call From Drunken Bill Clinton</li>
<li>Miss USA falls in Miss Universe</li>
<li>Trump tower collapses following fire</li>
<li>Al Pacino investigated by police for mob funding</li>
<li>Savage dog attack leaves students in critical condition</li>
<li>New York Knicks team killed in bus accident</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>

<p>These are just some samples of the subjects and bodies of malware-luring spam that arrived here over the past few days. And these aren't the really sick ones.</p>

<p>The destination pages of the URLs supplied in the messages typically include a link that supposedly shows a video, but in truth downloads an executable malware loader. At the same time, those pages silently try to load malware through an invisible iframe element&mdash;particularly targeting unpatched Windows machines visiting with Internet Explorer web browsers. From my peeks into the iframe script attacks, it seems to me that more than one gang is at work here. Thus, the gangs appear to be competing for victims' attention through increasingly outlandish email lures.</p>

<p>It's like being in the supermarket checkout line while sitting in front of your computer. But when you're checking your iPhone email while actually standing in the checkout line, you are sucked into a vortex that makes you believe that Angelina Jolie's twins were delivered looking exactly like Sonny and Cher.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/07/supermarket_tab.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/07/supermarket_tab.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:32:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Mother of All IRS Refund Scams</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Phishing messages hiding in Internal Revenue Service clothing are nothing new (see <a href="http://spamwars.com/archives/2006/03/the_irs_refund.html">here [2006]</a> and <a href="http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/02/irs_refund_scam.html">here [2008]</a>), so I barely gave one that arrived today much thought at first:</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch07_24_08a.jpg" alt="IRS Refund Phishing email message" />
</blockquote>

<p>After verifying that the destination of the link (to a free web hosting service) wasn't going to blow up my computer, I checked out the page in a web browser to see how this crook was going to try to pry personal identity info from visitors. In the past, IRS phishing scams have aimed at Social Security numbers (the primary way the IRS distinguishes one private citizen from another) and credit card data (where the refunds are supposedly to be credited&mdash;what a joke!).</p>

<p>The destination page, however, was not something I had seen before:</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch07_24_08b.jpg" alt="Phony IRS refund web page" />
</blockquote>

<p>This one doesn't ask for any personal ID info on the landing page. Instead it presents a popup list of banks from which to choose where you want your refund posted (like the IRS offers for regular tax refunds):</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch07_24_08c.jpg" alt="Popup list of banks" />
</blockquote>

<p>When you click the Submit button, you are presented with a facsimile of the chosen bank's online banking login page, like this one:</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch07_24_08d.jpg" alt="Phony bank login page" />
</blockquote>

<p>Yes, friends, this guy had set up bogus login pages for every one of the banks in the list. In other words, by way of a single style of phishing message from an organization that would get every U.S. citizen's attention, this crook has found a way to phish for <strong>fourteen</strong> financial institutions! No more confusion for recipients who are, say, Bank of America customers but who receive a phishing message about Washington Mutual. One scam fits (nearly) all!</p>

<p>So, this really isn't an IRS scam. It's a Massively Multibank Online Phish, or MMOP for short.</p>

<p>To freehostia.com's credit, the entire site was taken down within a couple hours of my phishing message having been sent. A lot of work went into creating all that content&mdash;I mean, this guy had to rip off login screens from 14 bank web sites&mdash;so I fully expect the full package to resurrect itself elsewhere in the future. It seems that to Ben Franklin's precious list, "death and taxes," we must add "scammers."</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/07/the_mother_of_a.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2008/07/the_mother_of_a.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:39:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>